武汉理工大学博士学位论文评审评价表
WHUT Evaluation Form for Doctoral Degree Thesis Review
（人文社科类Humanities and Social Science）
学位论文题目 Degree Thesis Title 学科Discipline （专业Major） 论文研究方向 Research Orientation 作者姓名 Author Name 指导教师 姓名、职称 Supervisor Name &Title 论文编号 Thesis Serial No. 评阅人 工作单位 Reviewer Work Unit 评阅人姓名 及职称 Reviewer Name &Title 评阅人 研究方向 Reviewer Research Orientation 评阅日期 Review Date 学位论文的主要创新点（由博士生本人填写，最多不超过5项）： Main innovation points of degree thesis (filled in by PhD candidate, no more than 5 items):
论文题目Thesis Title 学科Discipline（专业Major） 评议项目 Evaluation Items 评价要素Review Factors 选题的前沿性和开创性；研究的理论意义、现实意义；对国内外该选题及相关领域发展现状的归纳、总结情况。 It is a pioneering and innovative thesis proposal. 优秀 Excellent 良好 Good 一般 较差 GenPoor eral 论文选题 与文献综述 Thesis Proposal &Literature Summary The research has theoretical and practical significance; It summarizes the internal & external trends of the related area. 对学科发展的贡献；对解决社会发展中的重要理论问题和现实问题的作用；论文及成果对文化事业的发展和社会进步的影响和贡献。 It contributes to the development of the discipline. It has function of solving the important theoretical and realistic problems existing in the development of society; Thesis and its achievements influence and contribute to the development of cultural undertakings and social progress. 论文体现的学科理论基础坚实宽广程度和专门知识系统深入程度；论文研究方法基础知识 的科学性，引证资料的翔实性；论文所体和科研能力 现的作者从事科学研究的能力。 Basic knowledge Thesis embodies a solid theoretical basis of and scientific the discipline and a depth knowledge research capability system; It has scientific research method and detailed and accurate reference. It presents an independent scientific research capability of the author. 论文规范性与 引文的规范性；学风的严谨性；论文结构学风严谨性 的逻辑性；文字表述的准确性、流畅性。 Normalization and Normative reference; Rigorous academic preciseness style; Logical thesis structure; Accurate and of thesis fluent literal expression. 创新性及 论文价值 Innovation and the value of thesis 总体评价Overall Evaluation 给出百分制总评成绩 100 scoring system and grading system （90~100为优秀；75~为良好；60~74为一般；59分及以下为较差） （90~100=Excellent；75~=Good；60~74=General；59 or less than 59=Poor） 评价分数Evaluation Score： 评价等级Evaluation Grade： □达到博士学位论文水平，准予答辩（90~100分） Meet the requirement for doctoral degree thesis, defense is permitted（90~100 Marks） □准予答辩，但须对论文进行修改后答辩（75~分） 是否同意答辩 Decision of Defense Application Meet the requirement for doctoral degree thesis, defense is permitted after modification. （75~ Marks） □未达到博士学位论文水平，不准答辩，须对论文进行较大修改后重评（60~74分） Unsatisfactory doctoral degree thesis，defense is not permitted and reevaluation is required after material alteration .（60~74 Marks） □未达到博士学位论文水平，不准答辩（小于≤60分Marks） Unsatisfactory doctoral degree thesis，defense is not permitted. 是否推荐该论文 参加优秀论文评选 Recommend as excellent thesis or not? □是Yes □否No □很熟悉Very familiar □熟悉Familiar □一般General 年Year 月Month 日Day 熟悉程度 Familiarity 评阅人Reviewer：（签字Signature） 对学位论文的学术评语（请对论文的学术水平、创新性做出简要评述，包括选题意义、论文创新点、学科知识的掌握、写作规范性和逻辑性等） Academic comments on the degree thesis (Please make comment on the academic level and innovation of the thesis, including the significance of the thesis proposal, the innovation points, mastery of disciplinary knowledge, normative and logical expression in writing.)
论文的不足之处和建议(明确指出论文中存在的问题和不足之处，并请提出修改建议。) Weakness of thesis and suggestion ( Please clearly point out the weakness and problems existing in the thesis and make suggestion on modification of the degree thesis.)
